Joywar, play to protect.

The reworking of the work of another person is not a new practice in the art world , and often the original authors involved have expressed disappointment at having lost a part of their 'paternity'. Paradoxical though is the case of Joy Garnett, an artist who is going to suffer because of a violation of copyright for his role in painting some famous newspaper photos of the seventies. One of the original photographers asked a few thousand dollars in compensation and ordered that the work ('Molotov') no longer faces, nor published and that its replicas are removed even from the web. The absurdity of the request the spontaneous response was to create a network of sites that show the image 'prohibited' in some form. The infinite reproduction of the work is the political response that makes use of a much-needed technical assumption (the immateriality of reproduction in the network, and then its simple duplication), as now accepted by all, except, perhaps, by the artists still sitting privileges on their market.