386DX/Alexei Shulgin interview (the singing machine)

386DX

by Alessandro Ludovico

After the disembodiment of the physical medium (cd vs mp3 files) do you think the music world is ready for the disembodiment of the musical performer?
Not at all, on the contrary, I think that importance of live performance increases even more. People still have bodies, right? And music is still a sensual medium so live concert is a sensual two-way experience between ‘real’ performers and the audience. Also I think that a changefrom vinyl (analog) to cd (digital) carrier made much more difference than a change from cd to mp3 (which is also digital). In this sense vinyl LP’s could substitute live performer in a better way because of their quality of originality (all copies would be of an inferior quality) and object qualities (big size, colorful covers, physicality of sound tracks). People will always need this “here and now” feeling – look how many football fans travel to witness the game from a real stadium stands (not always in the first row!) although they could enjoy much more details via TV broadcast.

As you included all the software on the cd, 386DX is also the first ‘portable musician’. What kind of feedback you got from 386DX fans?
Surprisingly, not much. Seems like most of people use objects in the way they are used to: if it’s a CD – let’s play it! This can also be understood in relation to my answer to the previous question – 386 DX’s live gigs are quite popular. But still I think it was a good idea to include software so everyone could reconstruct the original 386 DX interface. If not practically – then conceptually. One more meaning layer so to say.

As a street performer, 386DX is a successful hardware/software combination asking for spare changes. Don’t you think it embodies, with its singing voice, the human touch we’re always seeking in the machines?
Oh yes, that’s where the effect comes from! Similar to looking at monkeys in a zoo and finding funny similarities they have to humans. And also, there are big cyberpunk, cyborg and artificial intelligence cultures that are very much integrated in general pop culture these days. Robot begging for money gives a relief – it’s not superior to humans (yet!).

After the release of ‘The best of’ and lots of live dates, what’ll be the next implementation of 386 DX?
I have just released the second CD with Russian rock hits (it’s title “The Legend of Russian Rock” that parodies the title of the famous CD series) and now working on another project which is not “another 386 DX” project but rather a further development. I will not tell you what exactly it is because I might fail with it, but I have good expectations for the coming autumn. Also I thing that the project still has big potential in integrating in a mainstream music scene. I am invited to Sonar/Barcelona this year and there are talks about other big events.

Do you think a ‘software musician’ is a new possible subject to consider in the copyright/copyleft debate? And what 386dx’d think about it as it is formed by abandonware?
Ha, never thought about that… Do you think I should apply for a patent? Interesting enough (also from the copyright point of view) is that 386 DX is nothing but combination of copyrighted items: pieces of commercial and free software, songs with melodies and lyrics. It’s not a product but a custom combination of many products that turns to be a unique entity. And it illustrates the idea that artist today is an information filter and re-transmitter.